Clean slate principle extinguishes uncrystallised operational claims and bars continuation of pending recovery and arbitral proceedings after plan app...
Works contract classification governs composite layout-development contracts where VAT-paid goods are transferred alongside construction and infrastru...
Specified income tax exemption for pollution control body remains conditional on non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return filin...
Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
Imported automatic soap dispensers were held classifiable under CTI 8424 89 90 as mechanical appliances for dispersing liquids. The Tribunal applied the distinction between dispersing and spraying, finding that the product senses the hand, mixes air with liquid soap, and dispenses foam through an outlet, but does not spray liquid. Because Chapter Heading 9616 covers sprays, including toiletry sprays, and its HSN notes exclude dispersing or spraying appliances covered by Chapter 8424, classification under CTI 9616 10 20 was rejected. The departmental classification was held erroneous and the contrary appellate order was set aside.
Imported automatic soap dispensers were held classifiable under CTI 8424 89 90 as mechanical appliances for dispersing liquids. The Tribunal applied the distinction between dispersing and spraying, finding that the product senses the hand, mixes air with liquid soap, and dispenses foam through an outlet, but does not spray liquid. Because Chapter Heading 9616 covers sprays, including toiletry sprays, and its HSN notes exclude dispersing or spraying appliances covered by Chapter 8424, classification under CTI 9616 10 20 was rejected. The departmental classification was held erroneous and the contrary appellate order was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.