Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1461 to 1480 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Waiver under Section 244 for a company limited by guarantee was considered on the basis of prima facie oppression and mismanagement, exceptional circumstances, and alleged violation of the Articles of Association. The Appellate Tribunal accepted that at the waiver stage a detailed merits review was unnecessary and that concise reasons were sufficient if relevant factors were considered. It found that the order had addressed the club's affairs, the alleged illegal termination and suspension of a member during pending proceedings, the convening of the EOGM, and broader mismanagement allegations. The challenge was treated as affecting members' rights and club governance, and the withdrawal of 49 members did not defeat waiver at that stage.
Waiver under Section 244 for a company limited by guarantee was considered on the basis of prima facie oppression and mismanagement, exceptional circumstances, and alleged violation of the Articles of Association. The Appellate Tribunal accepted that at the waiver stage a detailed merits review was unnecessary and that concise reasons were sufficient if relevant factors were considered. It found that the order had addressed the club's affairs, the alleged illegal termination and suspension of a member during pending proceedings, the convening of the EOGM, and broader mismanagement allegations. The challenge was treated as affecting members' rights and club governance, and the withdrawal of 49 members did not defeat waiver at that stage.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.