Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Waiver under Section 244 for a company limited by guarantee was considered on the basis of prima facie oppression and mismanagement, exceptional circumstances, and alleged violation of the Articles of Association. The Appellate Tribunal accepted that at the waiver stage a detailed merits review was unnecessary and that concise reasons were sufficient if relevant factors were considered. It found that the order had addressed the club's affairs, the alleged illegal termination and suspension of a member during pending proceedings, the convening of the EOGM, and broader mismanagement allegations. The challenge was treated as affecting members' rights and club governance, and the withdrawal of 49 members did not defeat waiver at that stage.
Waiver under Section 244 for a company limited by guarantee was considered on the basis of prima facie oppression and mismanagement, exceptional circumstances, and alleged violation of the Articles of Association. The Appellate Tribunal accepted that at the waiver stage a detailed merits review was unnecessary and that concise reasons were sufficient if relevant factors were considered. It found that the order had addressed the club's affairs, the alleged illegal termination and suspension of a member during pending proceedings, the convening of the EOGM, and broader mismanagement allegations. The challenge was treated as affecting members' rights and club governance, and the withdrawal of 49 members did not defeat waiver at that stage.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
