Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Waiver under Section 244 for a company limited by guarantee was considered on the basis of prima facie oppression and mismanagement, exceptional circumstances, and alleged violation of the Articles of Association. The Appellate Tribunal accepted that at the waiver stage a detailed merits review was unnecessary and that concise reasons were sufficient if relevant factors were considered. It found that the order had addressed the club's affairs, the alleged illegal termination and suspension of a member during pending proceedings, the convening of the EOGM, and broader mismanagement allegations. The challenge was treated as affecting members' rights and club governance, and the withdrawal of 49 members did not defeat waiver at that stage.
Waiver under Section 244 for a company limited by guarantee was considered on the basis of prima facie oppression and mismanagement, exceptional circumstances, and alleged violation of the Articles of Association. The Appellate Tribunal accepted that at the waiver stage a detailed merits review was unnecessary and that concise reasons were sufficient if relevant factors were considered. It found that the order had addressed the club's affairs, the alleged illegal termination and suspension of a member during pending proceedings, the convening of the EOGM, and broader mismanagement allegations. The challenge was treated as affecting members' rights and club governance, and the withdrawal of 49 members did not defeat waiver at that stage.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
