Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The NCLAT rejected the promoter's revised settlement proposal for Project Estella because the CIRP had already revived, a CoC-approved resolution plan was pending before the Adjudicating Authority, prior proposals had been rejected, and the homebuyers had voted against considering the promoter's bid. The promoter's reliance on an arrangement with BCD Mumbai Pvt. Ltd. was treated as non-binding and insufficient to show project completion. For Project NCR Greens, the Tribunal recognised the promoter's obligation to complete the substantially finished project, remove defects and hand over remaining units within six months, subject to majority approval of the financial creditors including Punjab & Sind Bank; failing such approval, insolvency directions would follow.
The NCLAT rejected the promoter's revised settlement proposal for Project Estella because the CIRP had already revived, a CoC-approved resolution plan was pending before the Adjudicating Authority, prior proposals had been rejected, and the homebuyers had voted against considering the promoter's bid. The promoter's reliance on an arrangement with BCD Mumbai Pvt. Ltd. was treated as non-binding and insufficient to show project completion. For Project NCR Greens, the Tribunal recognised the promoter's obligation to complete the substantially finished project, remove defects and hand over remaining units within six months, subject to majority approval of the financial creditors including Punjab & Sind Bank; failing such approval, insolvency directions would follow.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
