Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
The NCLAT rejected the promoter's revised settlement proposal for Project Estella because the CIRP had already revived, a CoC-approved resolution plan was pending before the Adjudicating Authority, prior proposals had been rejected, and the homebuyers had voted against considering the promoter's bid. The promoter's reliance on an arrangement with BCD Mumbai Pvt. Ltd. was treated as non-binding and insufficient to show project completion. For Project NCR Greens, the Tribunal recognised the promoter's obligation to complete the substantially finished project, remove defects and hand over remaining units within six months, subject to majority approval of the financial creditors including Punjab & Sind Bank; failing such approval, insolvency directions would follow.
The NCLAT rejected the promoter's revised settlement proposal for Project Estella because the CIRP had already revived, a CoC-approved resolution plan was pending before the Adjudicating Authority, prior proposals had been rejected, and the homebuyers had voted against considering the promoter's bid. The promoter's reliance on an arrangement with BCD Mumbai Pvt. Ltd. was treated as non-binding and insufficient to show project completion. For Project NCR Greens, the Tribunal recognised the promoter's obligation to complete the substantially finished project, remove defects and hand over remaining units within six months, subject to majority approval of the financial creditors including Punjab & Sind Bank; failing such approval, insolvency directions would follow.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
