Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
The NCLAT rejected the promoter's revised settlement proposal for Project Estella because the CIRP had already revived, a CoC-approved resolution plan was pending before the Adjudicating Authority, prior proposals had been rejected, and the homebuyers had voted against considering the promoter's bid. The promoter's reliance on an arrangement with BCD Mumbai Pvt. Ltd. was treated as non-binding and insufficient to show project completion. For Project NCR Greens, the Tribunal recognised the promoter's obligation to complete the substantially finished project, remove defects and hand over remaining units within six months, subject to majority approval of the financial creditors including Punjab & Sind Bank; failing such approval, insolvency directions would follow.
The NCLAT rejected the promoter's revised settlement proposal for Project Estella because the CIRP had already revived, a CoC-approved resolution plan was pending before the Adjudicating Authority, prior proposals had been rejected, and the homebuyers had voted against considering the promoter's bid. The promoter's reliance on an arrangement with BCD Mumbai Pvt. Ltd. was treated as non-binding and insufficient to show project completion. For Project NCR Greens, the Tribunal recognised the promoter's obligation to complete the substantially finished project, remove defects and hand over remaining units within six months, subject to majority approval of the financial creditors including Punjab & Sind Bank; failing such approval, insolvency directions would follow.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
