Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The NCLAT rejected the promoter's revised settlement proposal for Project Estella because the CIRP had already revived, a CoC-approved resolution plan was pending before the Adjudicating Authority, prior proposals had been rejected, and the homebuyers had voted against considering the promoter's bid. The promoter's reliance on an arrangement with BCD Mumbai Pvt. Ltd. was treated as non-binding and insufficient to show project completion. For Project NCR Greens, the Tribunal recognised the promoter's obligation to complete the substantially finished project, remove defects and hand over remaining units within six months, subject to majority approval of the financial creditors including Punjab & Sind Bank; failing such approval, insolvency directions would follow.
The NCLAT rejected the promoter's revised settlement proposal for Project Estella because the CIRP had already revived, a CoC-approved resolution plan was pending before the Adjudicating Authority, prior proposals had been rejected, and the homebuyers had voted against considering the promoter's bid. The promoter's reliance on an arrangement with BCD Mumbai Pvt. Ltd. was treated as non-binding and insufficient to show project completion. For Project NCR Greens, the Tribunal recognised the promoter's obligation to complete the substantially finished project, remove defects and hand over remaining units within six months, subject to majority approval of the financial creditors including Punjab & Sind Bank; failing such approval, insolvency directions would follow.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
