Condonation of Delay: directoral disputes and pending company proceedings can constitute reasonable cause, allowing a belated return to be treated as ...
Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
The Appellate Authority cannot entertain a GST appeal filed beyond four months from communication of the adjudicating order, and Article 226 interference to bypass that statutory bar is confined to exceptional and extraordinary cases. Here, the order was served through the GST Portal and was within the taxpayer's knowledge, while the medical evidence did not show any disabling circumstance sufficient to explain the delay. The Court therefore found no exceptional ground to condone the delay or invoke writ jurisdiction, and the rejection of the appeal as time-barred was sustained.
The Appellate Authority cannot entertain a GST appeal filed beyond four months from communication of the adjudicating order, and Article 226 interference to bypass that statutory bar is confined to exceptional and extraordinary cases. Here, the order was served through the GST Portal and was within the taxpayer's knowledge, while the medical evidence did not show any disabling circumstance sufficient to explain the delay. The Court therefore found no exceptional ground to condone the delay or invoke writ jurisdiction, and the rejection of the appeal as time-barred was sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
