Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The High Court found no breach of natural justice because the impugned order showed that a personal hearing had been given. It also relied on factual findings that no business activity existed at the declared premises and that fake invoices were used through the petitioner's credentials to avail input tax credit. As the dispute turned on contested facts, the Court declined to examine the merits in writ jurisdiction and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy, with liberty to file an appeal within the time granted and have it heard on merits.
The High Court found no breach of natural justice because the impugned order showed that a personal hearing had been given. It also relied on factual findings that no business activity existed at the declared premises and that fake invoices were used through the petitioner's credentials to avail input tax credit. As the dispute turned on contested facts, the Court declined to examine the merits in writ jurisdiction and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy, with liberty to file an appeal within the time granted and have it heard on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.