Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's ...
Exemption for examination-related services rejected where recipients were commercial entities; suppression sustained extended limitation and penalties...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1501 to 1520 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under section 271D was held unsustainable where no assessment order existed in the assessee's case and, therefore, no prior recorded satisfaction could be discerned regarding the alleged section 269SS default. The Tribunal followed its earlier view in Umakant Sharma and held that initiation and levy of penalty without assessment proceedings in the assessee's case was legally invalid. The impugned penalty was directed to be deleted.
Penalty under section 271D was held unsustainable where no assessment order existed in the assessee's case and, therefore, no prior recorded satisfaction could be discerned regarding the alleged section 269SS default. The Tribunal followed its earlier view in Umakant Sharma and held that initiation and levy of penalty without assessment proceedings in the assessee's case was legally invalid. The impugned penalty was directed to be deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
