Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Section 80P deduction covers Souharda credit societies, including qualifying surplus-deposit interest, subject to member KYC verification for cash dep...
Penalty under section 271D was held unsustainable where no assessment order existed in the assessee's case and, therefore, no prior recorded satisfaction could be discerned regarding the alleged section 269SS default. The Tribunal followed its earlier view in Umakant Sharma and held that initiation and levy of penalty without assessment proceedings in the assessee's case was legally invalid. The impugned penalty was directed to be deleted.
Penalty under section 271D was held unsustainable where no assessment order existed in the assessee's case and, therefore, no prior recorded satisfaction could be discerned regarding the alleged section 269SS default. The Tribunal followed its earlier view in Umakant Sharma and held that initiation and levy of penalty without assessment proceedings in the assessee's case was legally invalid. The impugned penalty was directed to be deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
