Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Penalty under section 271D was held unsustainable where no assessment order existed in the assessee's case and, therefore, no prior recorded satisfaction could be discerned regarding the alleged section 269SS default. The Tribunal followed its earlier view in Umakant Sharma and held that initiation and levy of penalty without assessment proceedings in the assessee's case was legally invalid. The impugned penalty was directed to be deleted.
Penalty under section 271D was held unsustainable where no assessment order existed in the assessee's case and, therefore, no prior recorded satisfaction could be discerned regarding the alleged section 269SS default. The Tribunal followed its earlier view in Umakant Sharma and held that initiation and levy of penalty without assessment proceedings in the assessee's case was legally invalid. The impugned penalty was directed to be deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
