Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
481 to 500 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A pre-existing dispute barred admission of the Section 9 operational debt claim where contemporaneous grievances over water supply, central air-conditioning, maintenance, and interference with use of the premises had been raised before the demand notice and were supported by proceedings seeking restoration of services and police assistance. Applying the Mobilox standard, the Tribunal treated the defence as a plausible contention requiring further investigation rather than a sham or moonshine defence. It therefore held that liability for charges claimed after the corporate debtor entered CIRP was genuinely disputed, affirmed rejection of the Section 9 petition, and dismissed the appeal.
A pre-existing dispute barred admission of the Section 9 operational debt claim where contemporaneous grievances over water supply, central air-conditioning, maintenance, and interference with use of the premises had been raised before the demand notice and were supported by proceedings seeking restoration of services and police assistance. Applying the Mobilox standard, the Tribunal treated the defence as a plausible contention requiring further investigation rather than a sham or moonshine defence. It therefore held that liability for charges claimed after the corporate debtor entered CIRP was genuinely disputed, affirmed rejection of the Section 9 petition, and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
