Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
A pre-existing dispute barred admission of the Section 9 operational debt claim where contemporaneous grievances over water supply, central air-conditioning, maintenance, and interference with use of the premises had been raised before the demand notice and were supported by proceedings seeking restoration of services and police assistance. Applying the Mobilox standard, the Tribunal treated the defence as a plausible contention requiring further investigation rather than a sham or moonshine defence. It therefore held that liability for charges claimed after the corporate debtor entered CIRP was genuinely disputed, affirmed rejection of the Section 9 petition, and dismissed the appeal.
A pre-existing dispute barred admission of the Section 9 operational debt claim where contemporaneous grievances over water supply, central air-conditioning, maintenance, and interference with use of the premises had been raised before the demand notice and were supported by proceedings seeking restoration of services and police assistance. Applying the Mobilox standard, the Tribunal treated the defence as a plausible contention requiring further investigation rather than a sham or moonshine defence. It therefore held that liability for charges claimed after the corporate debtor entered CIRP was genuinely disputed, affirmed rejection of the Section 9 petition, and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
