Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where liability was sought to be fastened on a power-of-attorney holder for dues attributed to a deceased proprietor, and service of notice as well as the basis of personal liability were disputed, the Court declined to examine the merits in writ jurisdiction. It held that the petitioner should first pursue the statutory remedy before the Certificate Officer under Section 9 of the Bengal Public Demand Recovery Act, 1913, and directed that the objection be decided on merits without rejection merely on delay. Limited interim protection was granted by staying any unexecuted warrant of arrest to enable recourse to that remedy.
Where liability was sought to be fastened on a power-of-attorney holder for dues attributed to a deceased proprietor, and service of notice as well as the basis of personal liability were disputed, the Court declined to examine the merits in writ jurisdiction. It held that the petitioner should first pursue the statutory remedy before the Certificate Officer under Section 9 of the Bengal Public Demand Recovery Act, 1913, and directed that the objection be decided on merits without rejection merely on delay. Limited interim protection was granted by staying any unexecuted warrant of arrest to enable recourse to that remedy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.