Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
The High Court held that, where the GST Appellate Tribunal has not yet been constituted, the statutory right of appeal remains available and limitation for filing that appeal runs from the date the President or State President enters office, whichever is later, in line with the Board Circular. It further held that writ jurisdiction cannot be used to bypass the statutory appellate remedy or avoid the pre-deposit requirement. Following its earlier order on identical facts, the Court dismissed the writ petition and granted liberty to pursue the appeal before the GST Tribunal against the impugned appellate orders.
The High Court held that, where the GST Appellate Tribunal has not yet been constituted, the statutory right of appeal remains available and limitation for filing that appeal runs from the date the President or State President enters office, whichever is later, in line with the Board Circular. It further held that writ jurisdiction cannot be used to bypass the statutory appellate remedy or avoid the pre-deposit requirement. Following its earlier order on identical facts, the Court dismissed the writ petition and granted liberty to pursue the appeal before the GST Tribunal against the impugned appellate orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
