Proportionality in company penalty quantification requires aggravating and mitigating factors; mechanical multiplication of director liability is impe...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court held that, where the GST Appellate Tribunal has not yet been constituted, the statutory right of appeal remains available and limitation for filing that appeal runs from the date the President or State President enters office, whichever is later, in line with the Board Circular. It further held that writ jurisdiction cannot be used to bypass the statutory appellate remedy or avoid the pre-deposit requirement. Following its earlier order on identical facts, the Court dismissed the writ petition and granted liberty to pursue the appeal before the GST Tribunal against the impugned appellate orders.
The High Court held that, where the GST Appellate Tribunal has not yet been constituted, the statutory right of appeal remains available and limitation for filing that appeal runs from the date the President or State President enters office, whichever is later, in line with the Board Circular. It further held that writ jurisdiction cannot be used to bypass the statutory appellate remedy or avoid the pre-deposit requirement. Following its earlier order on identical facts, the Court dismissed the writ petition and granted liberty to pursue the appeal before the GST Tribunal against the impugned appellate orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
