Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
ITAT held that section 56(2)(viib) applies only where the company receives consideration for issue of shares in the relevant previous year. Here, the consideration had already been received in an earlier year on issue of CCDs, and the impugned year involved only conversion of that existing liability into equity share capital and share premium, so the charging condition was not satisfied and the addition was deleted. On valuation under Rule 11U, the Tribunal held that the relevant balance sheet is the one drawn up on the valuation date, or the immediately preceding balance sheet if none is drawn up on that date. Since the valuation date linked to receipt of consideration was the earlier year, the audited balance sheet as at 31.03.2016 was correctly used.
ITAT held that section 56(2)(viib) applies only where the company receives consideration for issue of shares in the relevant previous year. Here, the consideration had already been received in an earlier year on issue of CCDs, and the impugned year involved only conversion of that existing liability into equity share capital and share premium, so the charging condition was not satisfied and the addition was deleted. On valuation under Rule 11U, the Tribunal held that the relevant balance sheet is the one drawn up on the valuation date, or the immediately preceding balance sheet if none is drawn up on that date. Since the valuation date linked to receipt of consideration was the earlier year, the audited balance sheet as at 31.03.2016 was correctly used.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
