Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
ITAT held that section 56(2)(viib) applies only where the company receives consideration for issue of shares in the relevant previous year. Here, the consideration had already been received in an earlier year on issue of CCDs, and the impugned year involved only conversion of that existing liability into equity share capital and share premium, so the charging condition was not satisfied and the addition was deleted. On valuation under Rule 11U, the Tribunal held that the relevant balance sheet is the one drawn up on the valuation date, or the immediately preceding balance sheet if none is drawn up on that date. Since the valuation date linked to receipt of consideration was the earlier year, the audited balance sheet as at 31.03.2016 was correctly used.
ITAT held that section 56(2)(viib) applies only where the company receives consideration for issue of shares in the relevant previous year. Here, the consideration had already been received in an earlier year on issue of CCDs, and the impugned year involved only conversion of that existing liability into equity share capital and share premium, so the charging condition was not satisfied and the addition was deleted. On valuation under Rule 11U, the Tribunal held that the relevant balance sheet is the one drawn up on the valuation date, or the immediately preceding balance sheet if none is drawn up on that date. Since the valuation date linked to receipt of consideration was the earlier year, the audited balance sheet as at 31.03.2016 was correctly used.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
