Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
641 to 660 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Release of detained gold articles was directed subject to compliance with the appellate order requiring payment of customs duty, redemption fine and penalty, because the principal relief sought had already been substantially granted and the revisional order had affirmed that relief in substance. Warehouse charges were waived for the period from the date of the appellate order until actual release, as the petitioner should not be burdened after redemption and release had been permitted. The writ petition was otherwise disposed of without further interference on merits.
Release of detained gold articles was directed subject to compliance with the appellate order requiring payment of customs duty, redemption fine and penalty, because the principal relief sought had already been substantially granted and the revisional order had affirmed that relief in substance. Warehouse charges were waived for the period from the date of the appellate order until actual release, as the petitioner should not be burdened after redemption and release had been permitted. The writ petition was otherwise disposed of without further interference on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.