Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Natural justice required the competition regulator to issue an action-oriented notice before departing from the Director General's findings. The Tribunal held that the Commission's directions on disclosure of pricing or discounting policy and on end-use restrictions varied from the investigation report, yet no effective opportunity was given to rebut that proposed disagreement. That omission deprived the appellant of a fair hearing and vitiated the order to that extent. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration after due notice, without any merits finding being affirmed.
Natural justice required the competition regulator to issue an action-oriented notice before departing from the Director General's findings. The Tribunal held that the Commission's directions on disclosure of pricing or discounting policy and on end-use restrictions varied from the investigation report, yet no effective opportunity was given to rebut that proposed disagreement. That omission deprived the appellant of a fair hearing and vitiated the order to that extent. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration after due notice, without any merits finding being affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.