Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
A refund claim arising from export of services was rejected by a non-speaking order that failed to record any specific finding on entitlement and merely reproduced clauses of the agreement. The High Court held that such bald disposal was contrary to the requirement of a reasoned determination and principles of natural justice, because the authority did not adjudicate the petitioner's submissions or material before it. The impugned appellate order was quashed, and the matter was remanded for de novo consideration by the original authority with an opportunity of hearing, leaving all contentions open.
A refund claim arising from export of services was rejected by a non-speaking order that failed to record any specific finding on entitlement and merely reproduced clauses of the agreement. The High Court held that such bald disposal was contrary to the requirement of a reasoned determination and principles of natural justice, because the authority did not adjudicate the petitioner's submissions or material before it. The impugned appellate order was quashed, and the matter was remanded for de novo consideration by the original authority with an opportunity of hearing, leaving all contentions open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
