Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A refund claim arising from export of services was rejected by a non-speaking order that failed to record any specific finding on entitlement and merely reproduced clauses of the agreement. The High Court held that such bald disposal was contrary to the requirement of a reasoned determination and principles of natural justice, because the authority did not adjudicate the petitioner's submissions or material before it. The impugned appellate order was quashed, and the matter was remanded for de novo consideration by the original authority with an opportunity of hearing, leaving all contentions open.
A refund claim arising from export of services was rejected by a non-speaking order that failed to record any specific finding on entitlement and merely reproduced clauses of the agreement. The High Court held that such bald disposal was contrary to the requirement of a reasoned determination and principles of natural justice, because the authority did not adjudicate the petitioner's submissions or material before it. The impugned appellate order was quashed, and the matter was remanded for de novo consideration by the original authority with an opportunity of hearing, leaving all contentions open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
