Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Refund rejection orders concerning unutilised input tax credit of compensation cess on zero-rated supplies were not sustained because the controversy was identical to that already decided in the assessee's own case. Applying the earlier Division Bench decision, the HC directed reconsideration by the original authority in accordance with law after granting an opportunity of hearing. The refund matters were thus remanded for fresh decision within four months, and the impugned rejection orders were set aside for that limited purpose.
Refund rejection orders concerning unutilised input tax credit of compensation cess on zero-rated supplies were not sustained because the controversy was identical to that already decided in the assessee's own case. Applying the earlier Division Bench decision, the HC directed reconsideration by the original authority in accordance with law after granting an opportunity of hearing. The refund matters were thus remanded for fresh decision within four months, and the impugned rejection orders were set aside for that limited purpose.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
