Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6221 to 6240 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund rejection orders concerning unutilised input tax credit of compensation cess on zero-rated supplies were not sustained because the controversy was identical to that already decided in the assessee's own case. Applying the earlier Division Bench decision, the HC directed reconsideration by the original authority in accordance with law after granting an opportunity of hearing. The refund matters were thus remanded for fresh decision within four months, and the impugned rejection orders were set aside for that limited purpose.
Refund rejection orders concerning unutilised input tax credit of compensation cess on zero-rated supplies were not sustained because the controversy was identical to that already decided in the assessee's own case. Applying the earlier Division Bench decision, the HC directed reconsideration by the original authority in accordance with law after granting an opportunity of hearing. The refund matters were thus remanded for fresh decision within four months, and the impugned rejection orders were set aside for that limited purpose.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
