Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
AAR held that rooftop solar supply under the power purchase arrangement was a supply of electrical energy, with the plant remaining the applicant's asset during the contract term. Electrical energy was treated as exempt goods, so the applicant was supplying only wholly exempt goods and, under Section 23, was not required to obtain GST registration. The Authority added that this exemption would not apply if taxable goods or services were supplied alongside electricity, or if taxable inter-State supplies were made. It also held that an advance ruling binds only the applicant and the relevant officers under Section 103, and only while the same law, facts and circumstances continue.
AAR held that rooftop solar supply under the power purchase arrangement was a supply of electrical energy, with the plant remaining the applicant's asset during the contract term. Electrical energy was treated as exempt goods, so the applicant was supplying only wholly exempt goods and, under Section 23, was not required to obtain GST registration. The Authority added that this exemption would not apply if taxable goods or services were supplied alongside electricity, or if taxable inter-State supplies were made. It also held that an advance ruling binds only the applicant and the relevant officers under Section 103, and only while the same law, facts and circumstances continue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
