Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
641 to 660 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interest under section 234C cannot be levied for advance tax instalments falling due before a newly set up business begins operations, because income from that source was not yet capable of estimation on those dates. Reading section 234C with the proviso to section 3 and clause (c) of the proviso to section 234C(1), the Tribunal held that the assessee's business, which commenced on 17.10.2019, created no obligation to anticipate or pay business advance tax for the June and September instalments. The earlier instalments were excluded, and the interest was directed to be recomputed only for the period after commencement of business.
Interest under section 234C cannot be levied for advance tax instalments falling due before a newly set up business begins operations, because income from that source was not yet capable of estimation on those dates. Reading section 234C with the proviso to section 3 and clause (c) of the proviso to section 234C(1), the Tribunal held that the assessee's business, which commenced on 17.10.2019, created no obligation to anticipate or pay business advance tax for the June and September instalments. The earlier instalments were excluded, and the interest was directed to be recomputed only for the period after commencement of business.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.