Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Interest under section 234C cannot be levied for advance tax instalments falling due before a newly set up business begins operations, because income from that source was not yet capable of estimation on those dates. Reading section 234C with the proviso to section 3 and clause (c) of the proviso to section 234C(1), the Tribunal held that the assessee's business, which commenced on 17.10.2019, created no obligation to anticipate or pay business advance tax for the June and September instalments. The earlier instalments were excluded, and the interest was directed to be recomputed only for the period after commencement of business.
Interest under section 234C cannot be levied for advance tax instalments falling due before a newly set up business begins operations, because income from that source was not yet capable of estimation on those dates. Reading section 234C with the proviso to section 3 and clause (c) of the proviso to section 234C(1), the Tribunal held that the assessee's business, which commenced on 17.10.2019, created no obligation to anticipate or pay business advance tax for the June and September instalments. The earlier instalments were excluded, and the interest was directed to be recomputed only for the period after commencement of business.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.