Condonation of Delay: Tribunal directed condonation where rectification proceedings were pursued, ordering merits adjudication after opportunity to be...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5321 to 5340 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that penalty for TDS default under section 272A(2)(g) was not justified because the assessee had shown reasonable cause, bringing the case within the protection of section 273B. Although the defaults related to different periods and the appeal was not a duplicate, the merits were covered by an earlier order in the assessee's own case on similar facts for the same assessment year. Following that precedent, the Tribunal upheld deletion of the penalty and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
The ITAT held that penalty for TDS default under section 272A(2)(g) was not justified because the assessee had shown reasonable cause, bringing the case within the protection of section 273B. Although the defaults related to different periods and the appeal was not a duplicate, the merits were covered by an earlier order in the assessee's own case on similar facts for the same assessment year. Following that precedent, the Tribunal upheld deletion of the penalty and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
