Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that penalty for TDS default under section 272A(2)(g) was not justified because the assessee had shown reasonable cause, bringing the case within the protection of section 273B. Although the defaults related to different periods and the appeal was not a duplicate, the merits were covered by an earlier order in the assessee's own case on similar facts for the same assessment year. Following that precedent, the Tribunal upheld deletion of the penalty and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
The ITAT held that penalty for TDS default under section 272A(2)(g) was not justified because the assessee had shown reasonable cause, bringing the case within the protection of section 273B. Although the defaults related to different periods and the appeal was not a duplicate, the merits were covered by an earlier order in the assessee's own case on similar facts for the same assessment year. Following that precedent, the Tribunal upheld deletion of the penalty and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
