Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
Turnover is a relevant comparability factor in transfer pricing because scale affects profitability, risk and economies of scale; disproportionately large software companies were therefore excluded, while judicial discipline and the doctrine of merger required following the jurisdictional High Court view. Companies lacking reliable segmental data, showing mixed product and service activities, or failing employee cost and service revenue filters were treated as unsuitable comparables. By the same functional test, a software services company with support from its annual report was included. In the marketing support segment, an indenting and trading entity was excluded, while an advertising agency was included because advertising and marketing support operate in the same promotional domain.
Turnover is a relevant comparability factor in transfer pricing because scale affects profitability, risk and economies of scale; disproportionately large software companies were therefore excluded, while judicial discipline and the doctrine of merger required following the jurisdictional High Court view. Companies lacking reliable segmental data, showing mixed product and service activities, or failing employee cost and service revenue filters were treated as unsuitable comparables. By the same functional test, a software services company with support from its annual report was included. In the marketing support segment, an indenting and trading entity was excluded, while an advertising agency was included because advertising and marketing support operate in the same promotional domain.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.