Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Turnover was held to be a relevant comparability factor in ITES benchmarking: where the assessee maintained separate segmental results and the dispute concerned a small ITES segment, comparables with vastly higher turnover were excluded because their scale and capabilities were not comparable. The Tribunal also held that transfer pricing adjustment can be made only in respect of international transactions and must be confined to revenue from associated enterprise dealings, not the entire business turnover. On the section 40(a)(i) issue relating to testing charges, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in line with the assessee's earlier year.
Turnover was held to be a relevant comparability factor in ITES benchmarking: where the assessee maintained separate segmental results and the dispute concerned a small ITES segment, comparables with vastly higher turnover were excluded because their scale and capabilities were not comparable. The Tribunal also held that transfer pricing adjustment can be made only in respect of international transactions and must be confined to revenue from associated enterprise dealings, not the entire business turnover. On the section 40(a)(i) issue relating to testing charges, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in line with the assessee's earlier year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
