Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Penalty for estimation of income and disallowances for tax non-deduction clarified: estimation-based penalties not sustainable; additions without conc...
Managerial remuneration disallowance under s.40A(2)(b) challenged over alleged tax-avoidance; appellate decision restored deletion of addition for dir...
A post-submission addendum that sought to improve the financial proposal and scoring under the evaluation matrix was treated as an impermissible modification of a final resolution plan, so the CoC validly rejected it. The Tribunal held that commercial wisdom governed evaluation of competing plans, the process note did not require acceptance of the highest NPV or highest score, and the RP's email did not amount to material irregularity. It further held that the approved resolution plan met the Code and CIRP Regulations, leaving no permissible ground for judicial interference with the CoC's decision or the approval order.
A post-submission addendum that sought to improve the financial proposal and scoring under the evaluation matrix was treated as an impermissible modification of a final resolution plan, so the CoC validly rejected it. The Tribunal held that commercial wisdom governed evaluation of competing plans, the process note did not require acceptance of the highest NPV or highest score, and the RP's email did not amount to material irregularity. It further held that the approved resolution plan met the Code and CIRP Regulations, leaving no permissible ground for judicial interference with the CoC's decision or the approval order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
