Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
A post-submission addendum that sought to improve the financial proposal and scoring under the evaluation matrix was treated as an impermissible modification of a final resolution plan, so the CoC validly rejected it. The Tribunal held that commercial wisdom governed evaluation of competing plans, the process note did not require acceptance of the highest NPV or highest score, and the RP's email did not amount to material irregularity. It further held that the approved resolution plan met the Code and CIRP Regulations, leaving no permissible ground for judicial interference with the CoC's decision or the approval order.
A post-submission addendum that sought to improve the financial proposal and scoring under the evaluation matrix was treated as an impermissible modification of a final resolution plan, so the CoC validly rejected it. The Tribunal held that commercial wisdom governed evaluation of competing plans, the process note did not require acceptance of the highest NPV or highest score, and the RP's email did not amount to material irregularity. It further held that the approved resolution plan met the Code and CIRP Regulations, leaving no permissible ground for judicial interference with the CoC's decision or the approval order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
