Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Cancellation of GST registration was set aside because the impugned cancellation and revocation orders were non-speaking, did not record reasons, and were passed without an effective opportunity of hearing. The Court treated the defects as vitiating the decision-making process and held that fresh consideration was required by the original authority. The matter was remanded for issuance of a fresh show-cause notice, grant of personal hearing, and passage of a reasoned order. The consequential notice based on the cancellation was also quashed, and the registration would stand restored if no fresh notice was issued within the time stipulated by the Court.
Cancellation of GST registration was set aside because the impugned cancellation and revocation orders were non-speaking, did not record reasons, and were passed without an effective opportunity of hearing. The Court treated the defects as vitiating the decision-making process and held that fresh consideration was required by the original authority. The matter was remanded for issuance of a fresh show-cause notice, grant of personal hearing, and passage of a reasoned order. The consequential notice based on the cancellation was also quashed, and the registration would stand restored if no fresh notice was issued within the time stipulated by the Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.