Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 16(5) was held to override section 16(4) and to extend the entitlement to avail input tax credit for invoices or debit notes relating to financial year 2019-20 where the return under section 39 was filed up to 30.11.2021. As the petitioner's returns were filed in the last week of October 2020, the authority's view that the right had expired on 25.10.2020 was contrary to the statutory extension. Rejection of the claim solely on delay was therefore unsustainable, the rejection orders were set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision in accordance with the Court's interpretation.
Section 16(5) was held to override section 16(4) and to extend the entitlement to avail input tax credit for invoices or debit notes relating to financial year 2019-20 where the return under section 39 was filed up to 30.11.2021. As the petitioner's returns were filed in the last week of October 2020, the authority's view that the right had expired on 25.10.2020 was contrary to the statutory extension. Rejection of the claim solely on delay was therefore unsustainable, the rejection orders were set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision in accordance with the Court's interpretation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.