Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
A single show-cause notice or composite assessment order under the GST Act cannot cover more than one tax period, and once the annual return due date is reached, it cannot extend beyond one year. Following prior Division Bench precedent, the HC held that the impugned order, as it covered multiple financial years, was invalid and was set aside on that ground alone. The matter was remanded, with liberty to initiate fresh proceedings separately for each assessment year, and the intervening period was directed to be excluded for limitation. Other grounds of challenge were left open.
A single show-cause notice or composite assessment order under the GST Act cannot cover more than one tax period, and once the annual return due date is reached, it cannot extend beyond one year. Following prior Division Bench precedent, the HC held that the impugned order, as it covered multiple financial years, was invalid and was set aside on that ground alone. The matter was remanded, with liberty to initiate fresh proceedings separately for each assessment year, and the intervening period was directed to be excluded for limitation. Other grounds of challenge were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
