Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment based on Investigation Wing information was sustained where the original return had only been processed under section 143(1), no return was filed in response to notice under section 148, and the recorded reasons showed a live link between identified penny stock transactions and the belief of escapement. The Tribunal held that the assessee could not invoke the procedural objections available after filing a return in response to reopening, and the challenge to jurisdiction failed. On the merits, the section 68 addition on share sale proceeds was deleted because the transactions were disclosed as part of regular share trading business, supported by contract notes, demat and bank records, and no exempt long-term capital gains had been claimed.
Reassessment based on Investigation Wing information was sustained where the original return had only been processed under section 143(1), no return was filed in response to notice under section 148, and the recorded reasons showed a live link between identified penny stock transactions and the belief of escapement. The Tribunal held that the assessee could not invoke the procedural objections available after filing a return in response to reopening, and the challenge to jurisdiction failed. On the merits, the section 68 addition on share sale proceeds was deleted because the transactions were disclosed as part of regular share trading business, supported by contract notes, demat and bank records, and no exempt long-term capital gains had been claimed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.