Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
641 to 660 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For capital gains purposes, the Tribunal treated the property as a long-term capital asset because the assessee had paid the full consideration and obtained possession and enjoyment in FY 2013-14; the later formal registration did not control the holding period. On that factual basis, indexation was allowed from FY 2013-14 and the gain was not assessed as short-term capital gain. The Tribunal also accepted registration charges paid in September 2013 as part of the cost of acquisition, since the supporting documents were unchallenged and there was no material to show duplication. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed and the additions were deleted.
For capital gains purposes, the Tribunal treated the property as a long-term capital asset because the assessee had paid the full consideration and obtained possession and enjoyment in FY 2013-14; the later formal registration did not control the holding period. On that factual basis, indexation was allowed from FY 2013-14 and the gain was not assessed as short-term capital gain. The Tribunal also accepted registration charges paid in September 2013 as part of the cost of acquisition, since the supporting documents were unchallenged and there was no material to show duplication. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed and the additions were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.