Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Concessionaire rights acquired under a DBFOT highway agreement were treated as depreciable intangible assets. The Tribunal held that the assessee had, at its own cost, obtained an exclusive licence and authority to operate and maintain the project highway and receive annuity during the concession period, and that this right fell within section 32(1)(ii) as a valuable business or commercial right. Depreciation was allowed on the opening written down value of the intangible asset for the years in appeal. The alternative claim for amortisation was rendered infructuous, and the remaining grounds were treated as academic or left open.
Concessionaire rights acquired under a DBFOT highway agreement were treated as depreciable intangible assets. The Tribunal held that the assessee had, at its own cost, obtained an exclusive licence and authority to operate and maintain the project highway and receive annuity during the concession period, and that this right fell within section 32(1)(ii) as a valuable business or commercial right. Depreciation was allowed on the opening written down value of the intangible asset for the years in appeal. The alternative claim for amortisation was rendered infructuous, and the remaining grounds were treated as academic or left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.