Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell awa...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5001 to 5020 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Concessionaire rights acquired under a DBFOT highway agreement were treated as depreciable intangible assets. The Tribunal held that the assessee had, at its own cost, obtained an exclusive licence and authority to operate and maintain the project highway and receive annuity during the concession period, and that this right fell within section 32(1)(ii) as a valuable business or commercial right. Depreciation was allowed on the opening written down value of the intangible asset for the years in appeal. The alternative claim for amortisation was rendered infructuous, and the remaining grounds were treated as academic or left open.
Concessionaire rights acquired under a DBFOT highway agreement were treated as depreciable intangible assets. The Tribunal held that the assessee had, at its own cost, obtained an exclusive licence and authority to operate and maintain the project highway and receive annuity during the concession period, and that this right fell within section 32(1)(ii) as a valuable business or commercial right. Depreciation was allowed on the opening written down value of the intangible asset for the years in appeal. The alternative claim for amortisation was rendered infructuous, and the remaining grounds were treated as academic or left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.