Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The clarificatory amendment governing computation of the limitation period under transfer pricing provisions was applied, and an order passed on 01.11.2019 was treated as within time; the CIT(A)'s finding that the TPO's order was time-barred was reversed. Because the CIT(A) had not examined the adjustment on research support services on merits, that issue was remanded for fresh adjudication. A fresh claim for India-USA DTAA relief against dividend distribution tax was not admitted, as it required foundational facts and documents, including residency evidence, not already on record and therefore was not a pure question of law.
The clarificatory amendment governing computation of the limitation period under transfer pricing provisions was applied, and an order passed on 01.11.2019 was treated as within time; the CIT(A)'s finding that the TPO's order was time-barred was reversed. Because the CIT(A) had not examined the adjustment on research support services on merits, that issue was remanded for fresh adjudication. A fresh claim for India-USA DTAA relief against dividend distribution tax was not admitted, as it required foundational facts and documents, including residency evidence, not already on record and therefore was not a pure question of law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
