Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6361 to 6380 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The clarificatory amendment governing computation of the limitation period under transfer pricing provisions was applied, and an order passed on 01.11.2019 was treated as within time; the CIT(A)'s finding that the TPO's order was time-barred was reversed. Because the CIT(A) had not examined the adjustment on research support services on merits, that issue was remanded for fresh adjudication. A fresh claim for India-USA DTAA relief against dividend distribution tax was not admitted, as it required foundational facts and documents, including residency evidence, not already on record and therefore was not a pure question of law.
The clarificatory amendment governing computation of the limitation period under transfer pricing provisions was applied, and an order passed on 01.11.2019 was treated as within time; the CIT(A)'s finding that the TPO's order was time-barred was reversed. Because the CIT(A) had not examined the adjustment on research support services on merits, that issue was remanded for fresh adjudication. A fresh claim for India-USA DTAA relief against dividend distribution tax was not admitted, as it required foundational facts and documents, including residency evidence, not already on record and therefore was not a pure question of law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
