Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The clarificatory amendment governing computation of the limitation period under transfer pricing provisions was applied, and an order passed on 01.11.2019 was treated as within time; the CIT(A)'s finding that the TPO's order was time-barred was reversed. Because the CIT(A) had not examined the adjustment on research support services on merits, that issue was remanded for fresh adjudication. A fresh claim for India-USA DTAA relief against dividend distribution tax was not admitted, as it required foundational facts and documents, including residency evidence, not already on record and therefore was not a pure question of law.
The clarificatory amendment governing computation of the limitation period under transfer pricing provisions was applied, and an order passed on 01.11.2019 was treated as within time; the CIT(A)'s finding that the TPO's order was time-barred was reversed. Because the CIT(A) had not examined the adjustment on research support services on merits, that issue was remanded for fresh adjudication. A fresh claim for India-USA DTAA relief against dividend distribution tax was not admitted, as it required foundational facts and documents, including residency evidence, not already on record and therefore was not a pure question of law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
