Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
IS 16731/ISO 8217 was treated as a marine-fuel standard, and its scope, safety clauses and flash-point requirements were read contextually to confine Distillate Marine Oil to use on board ships. Applying ejusdem generis, the reference to stationary diesel engines of the same or similar type as marine engines was held not to extend the fuel to industrial use generally, so the petitioner's wider end-use contention failed. The Court also declined to rewrite the prescribed end-use declaration, holding that the maritime regulatory conditions were not shown to be illegal or manifestly arbitrary. Provisional release was therefore made conditional on execution of the declaration in the form required by the authorities, and the writ petition was dismissed.
IS 16731/ISO 8217 was treated as a marine-fuel standard, and its scope, safety clauses and flash-point requirements were read contextually to confine Distillate Marine Oil to use on board ships. Applying ejusdem generis, the reference to stationary diesel engines of the same or similar type as marine engines was held not to extend the fuel to industrial use generally, so the petitioner's wider end-use contention failed. The Court also declined to rewrite the prescribed end-use declaration, holding that the maritime regulatory conditions were not shown to be illegal or manifestly arbitrary. Provisional release was therefore made conditional on execution of the declaration in the form required by the authorities, and the writ petition was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.