Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
IS 16731/ISO 8217 was treated as a marine-fuel standard, and its scope, safety clauses and flash-point requirements were read contextually to confine Distillate Marine Oil to use on board ships. Applying ejusdem generis, the reference to stationary diesel engines of the same or similar type as marine engines was held not to extend the fuel to industrial use generally, so the petitioner's wider end-use contention failed. The Court also declined to rewrite the prescribed end-use declaration, holding that the maritime regulatory conditions were not shown to be illegal or manifestly arbitrary. Provisional release was therefore made conditional on execution of the declaration in the form required by the authorities, and the writ petition was dismissed.
IS 16731/ISO 8217 was treated as a marine-fuel standard, and its scope, safety clauses and flash-point requirements were read contextually to confine Distillate Marine Oil to use on board ships. Applying ejusdem generis, the reference to stationary diesel engines of the same or similar type as marine engines was held not to extend the fuel to industrial use generally, so the petitioner's wider end-use contention failed. The Court also declined to rewrite the prescribed end-use declaration, holding that the maritime regulatory conditions were not shown to be illegal or manifestly arbitrary. Provisional release was therefore made conditional on execution of the declaration in the form required by the authorities, and the writ petition was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.