Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
A claim of forged Chartered Accountant certificates in a non-resident to resident share transfer failed because the appellant relied only on an uncorroborated denial and produced no independent proof of forgery. The Tribunal noted that the required documents had been routed through the authorised dealer bank, the transaction had been reported, and other material, including a later Chartered Accountant certificate and an invoice linked to the certificates, supported the respondents' version. In the absence of a police complaint or other corroborative evidence, mere suspicion was insufficient to displace the documentary record or establish contravention of the applicable FEMA and RBI transfer and pricing requirements. The appeal was dismissed and the respondents' exoneration was upheld.
A claim of forged Chartered Accountant certificates in a non-resident to resident share transfer failed because the appellant relied only on an uncorroborated denial and produced no independent proof of forgery. The Tribunal noted that the required documents had been routed through the authorised dealer bank, the transaction had been reported, and other material, including a later Chartered Accountant certificate and an invoice linked to the certificates, supported the respondents' version. In the absence of a police complaint or other corroborative evidence, mere suspicion was insufficient to displace the documentary record or establish contravention of the applicable FEMA and RBI transfer and pricing requirements. The appeal was dismissed and the respondents' exoneration was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
