Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1341 to 1360 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A claim of forged Chartered Accountant certificates in a non-resident to resident share transfer failed because the appellant relied only on an uncorroborated denial and produced no independent proof of forgery. The Tribunal noted that the required documents had been routed through the authorised dealer bank, the transaction had been reported, and other material, including a later Chartered Accountant certificate and an invoice linked to the certificates, supported the respondents' version. In the absence of a police complaint or other corroborative evidence, mere suspicion was insufficient to displace the documentary record or establish contravention of the applicable FEMA and RBI transfer and pricing requirements. The appeal was dismissed and the respondents' exoneration was upheld.
A claim of forged Chartered Accountant certificates in a non-resident to resident share transfer failed because the appellant relied only on an uncorroborated denial and produced no independent proof of forgery. The Tribunal noted that the required documents had been routed through the authorised dealer bank, the transaction had been reported, and other material, including a later Chartered Accountant certificate and an invoice linked to the certificates, supported the respondents' version. In the absence of a police complaint or other corroborative evidence, mere suspicion was insufficient to displace the documentary record or establish contravention of the applicable FEMA and RBI transfer and pricing requirements. The appeal was dismissed and the respondents' exoneration was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
