Tax determination against deceased proprietor invalid where no notice to legal representative; appeal rejected without addressing jurisdictional defec...
Revocation of GST registration and permission to file blocked returns; conditional defreezing of bank accounts after security and instalment applicati...
Right to access seized electronic evidence: impugned adjudication treated as additional show cause notice, remand for fresh hearing and return of mate...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6581 to 6600 of 96408 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A claim of forged Chartered Accountant certificates in a non-resident to resident share transfer failed because the appellant relied only on an uncorroborated denial and produced no independent proof of forgery. The Tribunal noted that the required documents had been routed through the authorised dealer bank, the transaction had been reported, and other material, including a later Chartered Accountant certificate and an invoice linked to the certificates, supported the respondents' version. In the absence of a police complaint or other corroborative evidence, mere suspicion was insufficient to displace the documentary record or establish contravention of the applicable FEMA and RBI transfer and pricing requirements. The appeal was dismissed and the respondents' exoneration was upheld.
A claim of forged Chartered Accountant certificates in a non-resident to resident share transfer failed because the appellant relied only on an uncorroborated denial and produced no independent proof of forgery. The Tribunal noted that the required documents had been routed through the authorised dealer bank, the transaction had been reported, and other material, including a later Chartered Accountant certificate and an invoice linked to the certificates, supported the respondents' version. In the absence of a police complaint or other corroborative evidence, mere suspicion was insufficient to displace the documentary record or establish contravention of the applicable FEMA and RBI transfer and pricing requirements. The appeal was dismissed and the respondents' exoneration was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
